APHC010399002016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 8752 OF Between: Subramanyam Panth Sadhu The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S S BHATT Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Gudapati Lakshminarayana SC For Municipalities in Rayalaseema Region 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 8752 OF 2016 Subramanyam Panth Sadhu AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): Gudapati Lakshminarayana SC For Municipalities in Rayalaseema MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) Gudapati Lakshminarayana SC For Municipalities in Rayalaseema THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 8752 OF 2016 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting elections to the Rajampet Municipality by implementing the G.O.Ms.No.114 dt.05.0.52015 issued by the Department of Municipal and Urban Development and as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith conduct elections in Rajampet Municipality forthwith by merging proposed Gram Panchayats and parts thereof by implementing G.O.Ms.No.114 dt 05.05.2015 issued by the Department of Municipal and Urban Development and pass such other orders....” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for an adjudication by this Court. 3. While recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 01.04.2025 KK THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 8752 OF 2016 01.04.2025 KK