Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28084 (AP)

Thotakura Venu Madhava Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/24473/2021 · 2025-07-23

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010398682021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24473/2021 Between: 1. THOTAKURA VENU MADHAVA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O D. NO. 56/1/5/38/A, NEAR RAILWAY GATE, N AGRAHARAM, ONGOLE CORPORATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GORANTLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2. M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP ) 3. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not releasing the 1st and final Bill No. 2019-237687 for an amount of Rs. 17,51,354/-, pertaining to the work of providing a Digital Library at Balaji Nagar SC Colony of the 16th Division in Ongole Municipal Corporation under the S.C.C. Grant, executed under Agreement No. 736/2018-19, dated 03.10.2018. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that amount has been credited to the account of the petitioner. 4. Recording the same, this Court is of the view that no further adjudication is required on merits. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 24.07.2025 PNS 4