1 APHC010008152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 522/2025 Between: 1. C RAGHAVA REDDY, S/O. LATE MUNISWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCC. RETD. EMPLOYEE R/O.D.NO.19-12-432, 2ND FLOOR, BAIRAGIPATTEDA TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KALAHASTRI REVENUE DIVISION TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. MALLELA RAMACHANDRAIAH, S/O.SETTA RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, R/O. YERPEDU VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri K. Arjun Chowdhary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. In compliance with the Order of this Court dated 24.01.2025, Smt. M. Bhargavi, Tahsildar (Respondent No.4) is personally present. She has presented the photographs indicating that the Endorsement was pasted in the field. It is also stated that when once the Endorsement is passed and uploaded online, which has been done on 05.11.2024 in this case, by default, an automatic generated message is also sent to the mobile of the Applicant. The photographs showing the pasting of the Endorsement on the field has the time and date recorded. 3. In this view of the matter, this Court deems that there was sufficient knowledge with regard to the issuance of Endorsement dated 05.11.2024 and that the Writ Petitioner has approached this Court with unclean hands by not disclosing these facts. This Court is not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 30.01.2025 Vns