Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35587 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8475 of 2025 Applicant :- Mukesh Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party. 2. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 421 of 2024, under Sections 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) B.N.S., Police Station Soraon, District Prayagraj during the pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not arrested at the spot and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The name of the applicant was disclosed by the co- accused persons, who were arrested at the spot. False recovery of motorcycles and spare parts of the motorcycles has been shown from the applicant. There is no independent witness to the alleged recovery. Prior to the instant case the applicant does not have any criminal history, however, after his arrest the applicant has been implicated in other cases. The applicant is in jail since 30.12.2024 and if he is released on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the record, this Court prima facie finds that the applicant was not arrested at the spot. There is no independent witness to the alleged recovery. Moreover, the applicant has remained confined for almost two months and there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, and no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial or intimidate the witness, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Mukesh Yadav, involved in the aforesaid case, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned subject to the conditions that he: (i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court; (ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; and, (iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 SKT/- Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad