PRABHU DAYAL YADAV S/O SHRI MANGTU RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
WMAP/214/2023 · 2025-05-06
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28075 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28075 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:19047] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 214/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8653/2006 Prabhu Dayal Yadav S/o Shri Mangtu Ram, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Village Megot Hala, Tehsil Nagal Choudhary District, Mahendergarh(Haryana). Teacher Grade Iii Retired From Govt. Primary School Patan, District Sikar(Raj.) ----Petitioner/Applicant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary To The Govt. Dept Of Education Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director Primary Education, Bikaner(Raj.)
3. District Education Officer, Sikar(Raj.)
4. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Block, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar(Raj.)
5. Head Master Govt. Primary School, Now Upgrade(Upper) Primary School Patan, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar(Raj.) ----Respondents/Non-Applicants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mina Ram Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Basant Singh Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Aniket Beniwal and Mr. Ramdhan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 06/05/2025 This writ miscellaneous clarification application has been filed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8653/2006 which was decided by this Court vide order dated 12.01.2017. The following prayer have been made in the miscellaneous application:-
[2025:RJ-JP:19047] (2 of 3) [WMAP-214/2023]
“It is therefore most respectfully prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allowed this S.B. Civil Mic application in the interest of justice issued directions to the respondents to carry out the modification and revision/re-fixation of pay of the retire Govt. teacher grade-III, 100% blind as per 5th, 6th 7th pay commission report. The Hon’ble court may kindly be passed an appropriate orders in the interest of justice. (I) The Hon’ble court may kindly be issued directions to the respondents to revised and refixed the basic pension as per 5th, 6th, 7th pay commission report as may be amended from time to times as per provision of law and issued revised P.P.O. of above period. The petitioner was retired after 22 years service due to 100% blind. (II) The Hon’ble court may kindly be allowed revised rates of disability pension as per rules 1996 w.e.f. 01-01-1996 to dated extra ordinary pension 1250/- as may be amended from time to time. (III) The Hon’ble court may kindly be issued directions to the respondents to release the medical allowance as per authorization w.e.f. from 01-01-1996 to the petitioner. Which is also admissible to every state govt. pensioner (IV) The Hon’ble court may kindly be issued directions to the respondents to released arrears of pension benefits of 5th, 6th, 7th C.C.P. with in prescribe period along with 9% interest on delay payment. (V) Hon’ble court may kindly be imposed appropriate cost against the respondent in favour of the petitioner for deliberately not
[2025:RJ-JP:19047] (3 of 3) [WMAP-214/2023] compliance and also dis-obeying of the Hon’ble court dated 12-01-2017.”
Learned counsel for the applicant fails to satisfy this Court that how this miscellaneous application is maintainable which travels much beyond the scope of the writ petition decided by this Court vide order dated 12.01.2017. In view thereof, this writ miscellaneous application is dismissed being misconceived.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /49