THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER v. DAWALSABS/O. DONGRISAB GHODESAVAR
WP/67041/2012 · 2025-04-01
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2807 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2807 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5784 WP No. 67041 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 67041 OF 2012 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, N.W.K.R.T.C., BAGALKOT DIVISION, BAGALKOT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, N.W.K.R.T.C., CENTRAL OFFICE, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR.B.PATIL, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
SRI. DAWALSAB S/O. DONGRISAB GHODESAVAR, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O: TIPPU NAGAR, 2ND CROSS, BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT.
… RESPONDENT (SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5784 WP No. 67041 of 2012
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 27.10.2022, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petition is filed in 2012. Now we are in the month of April, 2025. It is pending from almost thirteen years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46