Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.975 of 2025
------ Manoj Mohan Shrivastava, son of Late Krishn Mohan Prasad, Age-59 Years, resident of Tola- Bartand, Village- Nawadih, P.O.- B. Polytechnic, P.S. Dhanbad Nawadih, District Dhanbad-828130, State- Jharkhand. UID 777107086587 .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Badal Vishal, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, Addl. P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 13-02-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.11 of 2021 instituted under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-B) (a) of the Arms Act, 1959, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the Director of a security agency engaged by the Jharkhand State Co-operative Bank and on verification of the license of the gun of the gunman engaged by the petitioner, it came to light that the said license is a forged document. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is co-operating with the investigation of the case and has appeared before the Officer-in-Charge of Narayanpur Police Station and submitted his reply to the notice, through affidavit. It is next submitted that the responsibility regarding proof of genuineness of the documents filed the gunman lies upon the gunman. It is also submitted that the alleged gunman has already been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 06.09.2021 passed in A.B.A. No.6203 of 2021. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Jamtara in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.11 of 2021 with the condition that he will co- operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/