Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28068 (AP)

G. RAGHUMALA DEVI, KADAPA DIST. v. P. SURENDRANATHA REDDY, KADAPA DIST.

FCA/55/2009 · 2025-07-01

Ninala Jayasurya, Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010397722009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 55 OF 2009 Appeal under Section 19 of Family Courts’ Act, against the order passed in O.P.No. 113 of 2008 dated 13.02.2009 on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Kadapa. Between: G. Raghumala Devi, W/o. P.Surendranatha Reddy, D/o. G.Rama Linga Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 29 years. House wife, R/o. D.No. 2/845, Upstairs, Nehrunagar, Kadapa City, Kadapa District. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND P Surendranatha Reddy, S/o. P.Sesha Reddy, Aged about 33 years, Hindu, Working as S.l. of Police at Vempalli Police Station and R/o. Vempalli Village, and Post, Kadapa District. ...Respondent/Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V R Reddy Kovvuri Counsel for the Respondent: — The Court made the following: APHC010397722009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO: 55 OF 2009 Between: 1.G. RAGHUMALA DEVI, KADAPA DIST., W/0. P.SURENDRANATHA REDDY, D/0. G.RAMA LINGA REDDY HOUSE WIFE R/0. D.NO. 2/845, JUPSTAIRS, NEHRUNAGAR, KADAPA CITY, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1.P SURENDRANATHA, REDDY KADAPA DIST, S/o. P.Sesha Reddy Working as S.l. of Police at Vempalli Police Station and R/o. Vempalli Vilalge, and Post, Kadapa District. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. VR REDDY KOWURI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following JUDGMENT; (Per njs,j) At the time of considering the matter, learned counsel for the appellant while placing a copy of the order dated 10.02.2012 in F.C.A.No.54 of 2009, states that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed Sd/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /W SECTION OFFICER 1. The Judge, Family Court, Kadapa, Kadapa District, (with records) 2. One CC to ^ri V R Reddy Kovvuri, 3. The Section Officer, VR Section, Amaravati. 4. Two CD Copies To, Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh at SAM sree HIGH COURT DATED:02/07/2025 JUDGMENT FCA No.55 of 2009 I 1i SEP 2025 a Current Section patcv^^- DISMISSING THIS FCA AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS