- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5257 CRL.A No. 1198 of 2015 C/W CRL.A No. 1199 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1198 OF 2015 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1199 OF 2015 IN CRL.A No. 1198/2015 BETWEEN: VINAY. H.S S/O SRI SHESHE GOWDA H N AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT: No. 665, 8TH "A" MAIN ROAD 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 079. …APPELLANT (BY SRI ARUN G, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND: N. NAGARAJ S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS # 575, "KANASU" 11TH BLOCK, 2B MAIN ROAD 2ND STAGE, NAGARABHAVI BANGALORE – 560 072. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI H J ANANDA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5257 CRL.A No. 1198 of 2015 C/W CRL.A No. 1199 of 2015 THIS CRL.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT ORDER DATED 04.08.2015 PASSED BY THE XXII A.C.M.M, BANGALORE IN C.C.No.17138/2014 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT AND ETC., IN CRL.A No. 1199/2015: BETWEEN: VINAY.H.S. S/O SRI SHESHE GOWDA H N AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT : No.665, 8TH "A" MAIN ROAD 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 079. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI ARUN G, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND: B.N. VEENAKUMARI W/O N.NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS #575, "KANASU", 11TH BLOCK, 2B MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE NAGARABHAVI BANGALORE – 560 072. ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI H J ANANDA, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ORDER DATED 04.08.2015 PASSED BY THE XXII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.No.17137/2014-ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT AND ETC., - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5257 CRL.A No. 1198 of 2015 C/W CRL.A No. 1199 of 2015 THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation for the appellant in both the appeals. Learned counsel for the appellant was also absent on 23.01.2024, 14.02.2024 and 22.03.2024. Considering the said aspect, it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeals. Hence, both the appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65