A.TAMILSELVAN v. THE STATE REP, BY. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CRL OP/4899/2025 · 2025-02-24
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28060 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28060 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.4899 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.02.2025 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.No.4899 of 2025 A.Tamilselvan ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, Inspector of Police, Vettavalam Station, Tiruvannamalai District. (Crime No.28 of 2025). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.28 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Muthukumar For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.02.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.28 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 4(1)(i) and 4(1)(A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found to be in 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.4899 of 2025 illegal possession of brandy bottles -34 Nos ( each containing 180 ml). Hence, the case. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 13.02.2025 and since the contraband has been seized, the petitioner may be released on bail. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reiterated the case of the prosecution and submitted that petitioner has three previous cases and in those case petitioner is on bail. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering, the fact that the contraband has been seized; period of incarceration; petitioner is on bail in other cases; and since further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.4899 of 2025
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kilpennathur.
[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.4899 of 2025 be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 24.02.2025 Sma To
1. The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kilpennathur. 2. Inspector of Police, Vettavalam Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 3. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Thiruvannamalai. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.4899 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN., J. Sma Crl.O.P.No.4899 of 2025 24.02.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis