1 2025:CGHC:10750 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5304 of 2023 1 - Anil Kumar Gangesh S/o Shri Sahdev Ram Gangesh Aged About 47 Years Occupation - Vocational Instructor (Computer), Government School For Visually And Hearing Impaired, Mathpuraina, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Director, Social Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :- Mr. Vivekanand Samaddar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rahul Agrawal, Advocate For State :- Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 05.03.2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to decide and act upon the representations (Annexure P-1) made by the petitioner in a time bound manner 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court further pleased to grant such other relief(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice and fair play.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is anomaly with respect to the petitioner regarding his pay-scale, for which, he has filed a representation/application to the Director, Social Welfare Department way back on 27.06.2023 which is pending till date. As such, he is seeking limited prayer that the respondent authorities may kindly be directed to decide his pending representation filed on 27.06.2023 within a stipulated time. 3. Learned State counsel is having no objection with the limited prayer made by the petitioner for deciding the representation and submits that in case the petitioner approaches before the authorities concerned along with this order and the extra copies of application along with all the documents, the representation would be considered by the respondent authorities. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that there is anomaly with regard to the pay- scale of the petitioner as submitted by the petitioner, this Court hereby direct the respondent authorities to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner along with all the documents 3 and, in case, if there is any anomaly in the pay-scale of the petitioner, then the same shall be rectified forthwith while giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby disposed off. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha