Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28053 (CAL)

ABDUL MAINUDDIN @ SAIF v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/724/2025 · 2025-07-11

Suvra Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11.07.2025 Item No.12. Daily List Court No.42 Mithun IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA. CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRM (M) 724 of 2025 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) in connection with Spl. POCSO Case No.34/2023 arising out of Bowbazar Police Station Case No.215/2023 dated 29.10.2023 under sections 376/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 now pending before the learned Judge, exclusive (POCSO) Court, City Sessions Court, Calcutta. -And- In the matter of : Abdul Mainuddin @ Saif … … Petitioner (in Jail) Mr. Anindya Ghosh …for the petitioner Mr, Sourav Bhattacharya, Mr. S. Burman …for the de facto complainant. Ms. Baisali Basu, Mr. Kaustav Banerjee … …For the State Service report filed by the State is taken on record. Supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner is taken on record. At the outset the learned Advocate for the de facto complainant submits that the identity of the victim has been disclosed in Paragraph no. 11 of the application, particularly, Aadhar Card number which has already been uploaded in the portal of SARTHAC. 2 In such backdrop, this bail petition is found to be not in proper form. Leave is granted to the petitioner to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh. Learned Registrar Listing is directed to take immediate step for removal of the instant bail application from the portal of SARTHAC. The original certified copy of order dated 25.04.2025 of the learned Trial Court be handed over to the learned Advocate- on-Record for the petitioner. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)