PINKI SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WTAX/950/2025 · 2025-03-10
Piyush Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28050 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28050 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35196
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 950 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pinki Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav,Saroj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and Mr. B.K. Pandey, learned ACSC along with Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the State-respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. It is clarified that the dismissal of this writ petition will not affect the right of the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy available under the law.
Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Amit Mishra Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad