- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24703 WP No. 17142 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 17142 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI C NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE DODDANNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT CHIKKADANAVAHALLI VILLAGE, MASTI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK-563230 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHOKKAREDDY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA UNDER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563101 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISION KOLAR-563101 4. TAHSILDAR-SECRETARY OF REGULARIZATION OF THE LAND OF UNAUTHORIZATION CULTIVATION COMMITTEE OF TALUK MALUR, MALUR TALUK-563230 5. THE COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZATION OCCUPATION OF GOVERNMENT LANDS Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24703 WP No. 17142 of 2025 REPTS BY ITS CHARIMAN MALUR TALUK-563230 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR., AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING ANNEXURE-A ORDER DATED 19-12-2024 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 IN LND.RUO.(A).96/2019-20, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 19.12.2024 passed by respondent No.3 (Annexure- A) and order dated 31.10.2023 passed by respondent No.2 (Annexure-A1) inter-alia sought for a direction to respondent No.4 to issue grant certificate. 4. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24703 WP No. 17142 of 2025 into consideration the fact that respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner has remanded the matter to the respondent No.3-Assistant Commissioner to re-consider the case of the parties on merits after conducting spot inspection and same is taken note of and this court is having limited jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India to interfere with the remand order made by the Appellate Authority to the original authority, I do not find any merit in the petition. 5. In that view of the matter, taking into consideration the factual aspects on record, I do not find any merit in the petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, all contentions of the parties are kept open. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34