Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28038 (PNJ)

KULDEEP AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/5728/2020 · 2025-07-18

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 215-1 KULDEEP AND OTHERS THE STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Present: Mr. for the petitioner Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Seeking setting aside of 29.01.2020(Annexure P benefit of regularization Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in question is squarely Court in CWP Haryana and Others’. Learned factual position. Disposed of in terms of matter of ‘Pawan Kumar and Others (supra). JULY 18, 2025. Vishal Sharma IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. **** Mr.Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Seeking setting aside of (Annexure P-4), whereby the petitioners have been denied the regularization, the instant writ petition has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in squarely covered by the judgment dated CWP-5752-2020 titled as ‘Pawan Kumar Haryana and Others’. Learned State Counsel is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid factual position. Disposed of in terms of judgmen ‘Pawan Kumar and Others (supra). , 2025. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5728-2020 Date of Decision: 18.07.2025 ... Petitioners OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. Seeking setting aside of Office Order No.110 dated the petitioners have been denied the , the instant writ petition has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in judgment dated 21.04.2025 passed by this Pawan Kumar and Others Versus State of not in a position to dispute the aforesaid judgment dated 21.04.2025 passed in the ‘Pawan Kumar and Others (supra). (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT .07.2025 ... Respondents dated the petitioners have been denied the Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in passed by this and Others Versus State of not in a position to dispute the aforesaid t dated 21.04.2025 passed in the VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) VISHAL SHARMA 2025.07.23 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document