NAMONARAYAN SHARMA S/O SHRI BHINVARAM v. DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
CW/13588/2024 · 2025-03-11
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28035 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28035 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:10973] .
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13588/2024 Namonarayan Sharma S/o Shri Bhinvaram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Dhmikalan Panchayat Samiti Sanganer, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sanganer, Jaipur Rajasthan 303007.
2. Gram Sewak, Gram Panchayat Dahmikalan, Panchayat Samiti Sanganer, Jaipur Rajasthan 303007.
3. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Dahmikalan, Panchayat Samiti Sanganer, Jaipur Rajasthan 303007.
4. Satyanarayan Mundasiya S/o Jodharam Mundasiya, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Dahmikalan Panchayat Samiti Sanganer, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.S.Kachhawa for Mr. M.K. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh for Mr. S.N. Meena JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 11/03/2025
1. A limited prayer has been made in this petition for issuing a direction to the respondents to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner for redressal of his grievance.
2. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024, has held that whenever a representation is submitted by an aggrieved person, it is expected
[2025:RJ-JP:10973] (2 of 2) [CW-13588/2024] from the authorities concerned to decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order.
3. The instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation (pending, if any) expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
4. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.
5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/5