Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 2803 (RAJ)
PRABHURAM v. STATE
CRLR/1154/2006 · 2025-09-17
Shubha Mehta
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2803 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2803 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38033] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1154/2006 Prabhuram S/o Nand Lal, R/o Purani Chungi, Ajmer Road, Krishna Puri, Madan Ganj, Kishan Garh, District Ajmer ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj K. Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 17/09/2025 fopkj.k U;k;ky;] U;kf;d eftLVªsV] ¼d0[k0½ vtesj uxj if'pe] vtesj }kjk fu;fer QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k&108@2000 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 10-04-2006 ds }kjk fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 279] 337] 338 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa nks"kfl) ,oa n.Mkfn"V djrs gq, vf/kdre ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o 500 :i;s ds vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;kA bl fu.kZ; ds fo:) fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy la[;k&12@2006 ¼31@2006½ ¼118@2006½ esa vihyh; U;k;ky;] vij lS'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&2] vtesj }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 20-09-2006 ikfjr dj fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; o n.Mkns'k dh iqf"V dh xbZ gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk is'k dh xbZ gSA cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dk dFku jgk fd os vfHk;qDr dh nks"kflf) dks dksbZ pqukSrh ugha nsrs gSa ,oa vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+rs gq, blh izdze ij iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dks fuLrkfjr djus dk fuosnu djrs gSaA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr xjhc O;fDr gSA ?kVuk 25 o"kZ iqjkuh gksdj fnukad 17-03-2000 dh gSA fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr iwoZ esa
[2025:RJ-JP:38033] (2 of 4) [CRLR-1154/2006] 27 fnol vfHkj{kk esa jg pqdk gSA vr% ujeh dk :[k viukrs gq, fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+us dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA mUgksaus vius rdZ leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk voyEc fy;k& 1- Alister Anthony Pareira Vs. State of Maharashtra
MANU/SC/0015/2012 : (2012) 2 SCC 648 2- Haripada Das Vs. State of W.B.
MANU/SC/1627/1998 : (1998) 9 SCC 678 3- Chotu Ram vs. State S.B. Criminal Rev. Pet.
No. 905/2003 Dated 15.01.2025 Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us bldk fojks/k fd;kA fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dh lhfer izkFkZuk dks ns[krs gq, bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dk blh izdze ij fuLrkj.k fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izLrqr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr ds vuqlkj ifjoknh jkts'k dqekor us ,d rgjhjh fjiksVZ bl vk'k; dh ntZ djkbZ fd fnukad 17-03-2000 dks le; 10%15 cts ckgsrh fcfYMax ds lkeus ,d flVh cl la[;k vkjih tsM 5565 dks mlds pkyd us ykijokgh ls pykdj mls VDdj ekjh] ftlls mlds iSj dh gM~Mh VwV xbZA mDr fjiksVZ ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ dh tkdj ckn vuqla/kku fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa vkjksi i= izLrqr fd;k x;kA rRi'pkr fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 279] 337] 338 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vkjksi lqukdj miyC/k vfHk;kstu lk{; ds vk/kkj ij fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/k esa nks"kfl) djrs gq, vf/kdre ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o 500 :i;s vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k] ftlds fo:) vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk fujLr dj nh xbZA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls nks"kflf) dks dksbZ pqukSrh ugha nh xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa xq.kkoxq.k ij nksuksa U;k;ky;ksa ds vkykSP; fu.kZ;ksa dk miyC/k lk{; ds izdk'k esa fo'ys"k.k o foospu fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA dsoy fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+us dh lhfer izkFkZuk ij fopkj fd;k tkuk gSA [2025:RJ-JP:38033] (3 of 4) [CRLR-1154/2006] izdj.k dh ?kVuk 25 o"kZ iqjkuh gS] ftlesa fuxjkuhdkj dks vf/kdre ,d o"kZ ds dkjkokl ds n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dks vihyh; U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ds i'pkr~ n.M Hkqxrkus gsrq vfHkj{kk esa Hkstk x;k Fkk rFkk mldk ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj gksus ij fnukad 16-10-2006 dks mls fjgk fd;k x;k FkkA bl izdkj vfHk;qDr 27 fnol dh vof/k vfHkj{kk esa O;rhr dj pqdk gS rFkk o"kZ 2000 ls og vUoh{kk Hkqxr jgk gSA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh iwoZ esa fdlh vU; izdj.k esa nks"kflf) laca/kh dksbZ rF; i=koyh ij miyC/k ugha gSA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) dksbZ izfrdwy rF; Hkh vfHkys[k ij izLrqr ugha gqvk gSA vr% vc mls dkjkokl Hkqxrk;s tkus gsrq tsy Hksts tkus ls fdlh lkFkZd mn~ns'; dh iwfrZ ugha gksxhA vfHk;qDr dks fn;s x;s dkjkokl ds n.M dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk rd ?kVkus@lhfer djus ds laca/k esa izLrqr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa esa izfrikfnr fuEu fl)kUr egRoiw.kZ o
lqlaxr gS %& Alister Anthony Pareira (Supra) "There is no straitjacket formula for sentencing an accused on proof of crime. The courts have evolved certain principles: twin objective of the sentencing policy is deterrence and correction.
What sentence would meet the ends of justice depends on the facts and circumstances of each case and the court must keep in mind the gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, nature of the offence and all other attendant circumstances." Haripada Das (Supra) "...considering the fact that the respondent had already undergone detention for some period and the case is pending for a pretty long time for which he had suffered both financial hardship and mental agony and also considering the fact that he had been released on bail as far back as on 17-1-1986, we feel that the ends of justice will be met in the facts of the case if the sentence is reduced to the period already undergone..." ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mi;qZDr U;kf;d fofuf'p;ksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ,oa orZeku izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks fn;s x;s vf/kdre ,d o"kZ ds dkjkokl dks ?kVkrs gq, mlds LFkku ij mls vc rd Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+k tkuk U;k; ds fgr esa i;kZIr vkSj U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA [2025:RJ-JP:38033] (4 of 4) [CRLR-1154/2006] tgka rd vfHk;qDr ij vf/kjksfir fd;s x;s vFkZn.M dk iz'u gS] rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDr ij dqy 1]500 :i;s dk vFkZn.M vf/kjksfir fd;k x;k gSA ?kVuk 25 o"kZ iqjkuh gS] ftlesa vkgr jkts'k dqekor ds iSj dh gM~Mh VwVh gSA vr% izdj.k ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, vFkZn.M dh jkf'k esa la'kks/ku djrs gq, o`f) fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA ifj.kker% fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk nks"kfl)h dh gn rd fujLr dh tkrh gSA n.Mkns'k ds fcUnq ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; rFkk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr n.Mkns'k dks mikUrfjr@la'kksf/kr djrs gq, ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ds LFkku ij fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ls nf.Mr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ml ij vf/kjksfir vFkZn.M dh jkf'k dqy 1]500 :i;s ds vfrfjDr 10]000 :i;s vFkZn.M vf/kjksfir fd;k tkrk gSA mDr vfrfjDr vFkZn.M dh jkf'k N% lIrkg esa vfHk;qDr }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa tek djokbZ tkosxhA mDr vof/k ds Hkhrj vfHk;qDr }kjk vfrfjDr vFkZn.M dh jkf'k tek ugha djk;s tkus dh fLFkfr esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr n.Mkns'k izHkkoh jgsxkA bl U;k;ky; }kjk vf/kjksfir vfrfjDr vFkZn.M dh jkf'k 10]000 :i;s tek gksus ij vkgr@vkgr ds fof/kd izfrfuf/kx.k dks crkSj izfrdj fu;ekuqlkj vnk dh tkosxhA vfHk;qDr dks vknsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; esa bl fu.kZ; ds
fo:) fo'ks"k vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk izLrqr gksus ij mlesa mifLFkfr gsrq /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr 50]000 :i;s dh jkf'k dk futh ca/ki= ,oa 25]000&25]000 :i;s dh nks tekursa fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn N% lIrkg dh vof/k esa izLrqr dj rLnhd djkosaA rnuqlkj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA fu.kZ; dh izfr ds lkFk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc izsf"kr fd;k tkosA (SHUBHA MEHTA),J VISHAL SHARMA /07