Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28026 (JHR)

GUDDU SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2669/2025 · 2025-07-15

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:19244] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2669 of 2025 Guddu Singh, aged about 22 years, S/O-Jamuna Singh, R/O Village - Mattar, P.O+,P.S. - Karmatanr, District - Jamtara … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan , Adv. For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. PP. 03 / 15.07.2025 I.A. no. 7803 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of this Bail Application. Since, this Bail Application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) B.A. No. 2669 of 2025 The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111 (2) (ii), 317 (2), 317 (4), 318 (4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D, of I.T. Act.. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has defrauded the victim namely Irfan Khan to the tune of Rs. 30,000/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and three mobile phone with one SIM card was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 22 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 03.09.2024 as mentioned in para 22 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes to transfer Rs. 30,000 /- to the bank account of Irfan Khan without prejudice to his defence in this case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail showing the proof that the petitioner has transferred Rs. 30,000 /- to the bank account of Irfan Khan without prejudice to his defence in this case on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-