Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28025 (CHH)

MADHURI DEWANGAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5687/2025 · 2025-06-22

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:26982 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5593 of 2025 1 - Thanda Ram Kumhar S/o Shri Vishram Prasad Aged About 45 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), At Govt. Pramary School Pandripali, Block Dharamjaigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgrh 2 - The Director, Directorate Of Public Insruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Director Education Division Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - The District Education Officer Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - The Block Education Officer, Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh --- Respondents 2025:CGHC:26986 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5687 of 2025 1 - Madhuri Dewangan W/o Shri T.R. Dewangan Aged About 35 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Higher Secondary School, W.R.S. Colony Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director Education Division Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) --- Respondents 2025:CGHC:26987 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5718 of 2025 1 - Ashok Kumar Singh S/o Shri Madan Mohan Singh Aged About 49 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School, Jhingo, Block - Rajpur Chowki, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Joint Director Education Division Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector Balrampur-Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer Balrampur-Ramanujganj, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - The Block Education Officer Rajpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) --- Respondents 2025:CGHC:26990 3 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5780 of 2025 1 - Smt. Chandrakala Patel W/o Shri Niranjan Patel Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Mahua Tikara Patthalgaon District - Jashpur (C.G.) --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Joint Director School Education Surguja Division Ambikapur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Office Of The Collector District - Jashpur (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer District Education Office District - Jashpur (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Patthalgaon District - Jashpur (C.G.) --- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Mr. Shreyansh Mehta and Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyers. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 23-06-2025 1. By way of these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the impugned transfer orders and action of the respondents whereby the petitioners have been declared surplus Teachers and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners and if the petitioners are not granted interim relief, they will suffer with irreparable loss. Therefore, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of 4 records the petitioners have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. They would further submit that if the petitioners are having any grievance, they may move fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on their representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today, and appear before the said Committee on 30th June, 2025. Thereafter, the Committee shall decide the representation(s) of the petitioners within seven days from the date of receipt of representation(s) in accordance with law in objective manner. Till decision on the representation is communicated to the respective petitioners, the impugned transfer orders issued under Teacher Rationalization Instructions, so far as the petitioners are concerned, be kept in abeyance. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil