[2025:RJ-JP:34451] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10521/2025 Pradeep S/o Mohansingh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Hospital Road, Noorabad Police Station Noorabad, District Morena Madhya Pradesh. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 10522/2025 Dhruvsingh @ Vivek S/o Shri Rajveer, R/o Benda, Police Station Noorabad, District Morena, M.p. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10846/2025 Narendra S/o Balistar, R/o Madan Bai Police Station Nurabad Dis- trict Muraina Madhya Pradesh. (Accused Petitioner In Judicial Custody In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.160/2025 registered at Police Station [2025:RJ-JP:34451] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-10521/2025] Nihalganj, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge- sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) & 317(2) of BNS. 2. The first bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner Dhruvsingh @ Vivek was dismissed as withdrawn by this court vide order dated 31.07.2025 while giving liberty to renew the prayer for bail after submission of result of investigation. Now, charge-sheet has been filed in this matter thus, this second bail application has been preferred by the petitioner Dhruvsingh @ Vivek. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submit that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since 10.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. He submits that petitioners are habitual offender as several other cases have been registered against them. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of [2025:RJ-JP:34451] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-10521/2025] the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications. 7. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner-(1) Pradeep S/o Mohansingh, (2) Dhruvsingh @ Vivek S/o Shri Rajveer & (3) Narendra S/o Balistar shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners. In case the petitioners fail to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. [2025:RJ-JP:34451] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-10521/2025] 12. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /281-283