Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28024 (JHR)

SYED JAMAL AHMAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/912/2023 · 2025-01-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr). No.912 of 2023 ------ Syed Jamal Ahmad, Aged about 59 years, Son of Late S. Im Nazim, Resident of Malvviya Marg, P.O.: Sadar, P.S.: Sadar District: Hazaribag. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sujit Toppo, Forest Guard, Posted at West Divisional Forest office, P.O. & P.S.: Bada Bazar, District: Hazaribag. 3. DFO Hazaribagh West Division, Van Bhawan, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S.: Hazaribag, District: Hazaribag. 4. The Officer in charge, Katkamsandi Thana, P.O. & P.S: Sadar, Dist: Hazaribag .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III Mr. Deepankar, AC to GA-III ------ Order No:-06 Dated:-20-01-2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that since there is no merit in this Writ Petition (Cr.), hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this Writ Petition (Cr.). Accordingly, this Writ Petition (Cr.) is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/