■ / APHC010397402021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) r.£ B TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24286 OF 2021 Between: B Venkateswarlu, S/o B. Srinivasulu Chetty, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o D.No.11-35, SriPaada Kesava Apartment, S.V.Nagar, M.R.Palli, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh State. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chandragiri, Chittoor District. 4. The Station House Officer, Rural Police Station, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 5. Kalluru Haranadh, S/o Venkatesw amy chetty. Age 58 years, resident at Srinivasa Mangapuram Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor 6. Kalluru Srinivasulu, S/o K. Chengalrayulu, Age 54 years, resident at Srinivasa Mangapuram Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor 7. Kalluru Leela Krishnaiah, S/o K. Munirathnam, Age 50 years, resident at Srinivasa Mangapuram Village, Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor 8. Mabbu Damodarath, , S/o Mabbu Jaya chandraiah, Age 35 years Respondent No.4 to 8 are resident at Srinivasa Mangapuram Village Chandragiri Mandal, Chittoor ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.3 and 4 in interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and his property an extent of AcO-10 cents in Sy.No. 610/2C of Srinivasa Mangapuram of Chandragiri Mandal at the instance of the respondent Nos. 5 to 8 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India, and consequently praying this Hon'ble Court to direct the respondents No.3 to 5 not to interfere with the personal life and the petitioner property in any manner. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 , Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3and 4 not to harass the petitioner and his family members, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 8: SRI S VARADARAJULU CHETTY The Court made the following order: APHC010397402021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24286/2021 Between: 1.B VENKATESWARLU, S/0 B. SRINIVASULU CHETTY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/0 D.NO.11-35, SRIPAADA KESAVA APARTMENT, S.V.NAGAR, M.R.PALLI, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT OF HOME, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,GUNTURDISTRICT,ANDHRAPRADESHSTATE. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. SECRETARY 3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHANDRAGIRI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RURAL POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5.KALLURU HARANADH, S/0 VENKATESW AMY CHETTY, AGE 58 YEARS, RESIDENT AT SRINIVASA MANGAPURAM VILLAGE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR 6.KALLURU SRINIVASULU, S/0 K. CHENGALRAYULU, AGE 54 YEARS, RESIDENT AT SRINIVASA MANGAPURAM VILLAGE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR 2 7.KALLURU LEELA KRISHNAIAH, S/0 K. MUNIRATHNAM, AGE 50 YEARS, RESIDENT AT SRINIVASA MANGAPURAM VILLAGE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR 8.MABBU DAMODARATH, , S/0 MABBU JAVA CHANDRAIAH, AGE 35 YEARS, RESPONDENT N0.4 TO 8 ARE RESIDENT AT SRINIVASA MANGAPURAM VILLAGE, GHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 in interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and his property an extent of Ac.0-10 cents in Sy.No. 610/20 of Srinivasa Mangapuram of Chandragiri Mandal at the instance of the respondent Nos. 5 to 8 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, and consequently praying this Hon'ble Court to direct the respondents Nos.3 to 5 not to interfere with the personal life and the petitioner property in any manner and pass lANO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3and 4 not to harass the petitioner and his family members, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.S VARADARAJULU CHETTY 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAl PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24286/2021 ORDER; This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; “...pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and his property an extent of Ac.0-10 cents in Sy.No. 610/20 of Srinivasa Mangapuram of Chandragiri Mandal at the instance of the respondent Nos. 5 to 8 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, and consequently praying this Hon'ble Court to direct the respondents Nos. 3 to 5 not to interfere with the personal life and the petitioner property in any manner and pass... ” When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the respondent- police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 2. unofficial respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to 3. 4. costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Department of Home, AP Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh State. 1. The Principal Secretary, f 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chandragiri, Chittoor District. 4. The Station House Officer, Rural Police Station, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 5. One CC to Sri. P V Venkata Ravi Sankar and Dr. P.B Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP For Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. One CC to Sri. S Varadarajulu Chetty Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CD Copies. AL HIGH COURT DATED:05/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 24286 OF 2021 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS