Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28021 (ALL)

BRAJMOHAN SAINI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

WRIC/7092/2025 · 2025-03-09

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:34661 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7092 of 2025 Petitioner :- Brajmohan Saini Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amish Kumar Srivastava,Rajeev Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed for the following relief: "a. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2 to decide the application dated 20.01.2025 and further comply his own judgment and order dated 01.10.2024 and final decree dated 14.10.2024 passed in Case No. 11692 of 2024 Computerized Case No. T202411170211692 in between Satendra Kumar Versus Dinesh Kumar and others arising out of proceedings U/S 117 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Annexed as Annexure No. 8 to the writ petition)." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that final decree has been passed by the order dated 14.10.2024 under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 but the same has not been implemented. 4. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has remedy of filing an application for execution of the decree. 5. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to get the decree executed in accordance with the provisions of C.P.C. Order Date :- 10.3.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad