CWP-4865-2025 (O&M) 132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Usha Estate Officer, Chandigarh Administration CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Himanshu Ms. Ms. Aashna Gill, for SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of of plinth site No.4058, Sector 2. At the outset, learned U.T., Chandigarh submits that under Clause 28 of the 79 3. The learned counsel for the aforesaid submission made by the counsel for the respondent. 4. Considering the same, to the petitioner to 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: versus Estate Officer, Chandigarh Administration HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Himanshu Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Madhu Dayal, Additional Standing Counsel and Ms. Aashna Gill, Junior Panel Counsel for the respondent – U.T., Chandigarh. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue allotment letter of plinth site No.4058, Sector 25-D, Dainik Bhaskar Colony, Chandigarh. At the outset, learned Standing counsel for the respondent U.T., Chandigarh submits that the petitioner under Clause 28 of the 79th scheme in question The learned counsel for the petitioner could not controvert the aforesaid submission made by the counsel for the respondent. Considering the same, this petition is disposed of with a to the petitioner to avail remedy of an appeal, as aforesaid, 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4865-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: April 30, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondent SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioner. Madhu Dayal, Additional Standing Counsel and Counsel U.T., Chandigarh. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondent to issue allotment letter D, Dainik Bhaskar Colony, Chandigarh. g counsel for the respondent – has legal remedy of an appeal in question for redressal of her grievance. petitioner could not controvert the aforesaid submission made by the counsel for the respondent. this petition is disposed of with a liberty , as aforesaid, qua her grievance, 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner ….Respondent for issuance of a Writ the respondent to issue allotment letter – has legal remedy of an appeal petitioner could not controvert the liberty , MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.05 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-4865-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 before the Appellate Authority. In case, any such appeal is preferred by the petitioner within a period of 30 days, the Appellate Authority shall consider the same and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law, preferably, within a period of 03 months from the date of filing of such appeal. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE April 30, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.05 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment