Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28015 (GAU)

SUJOY PAUL v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/5737/2023 · 2025-11-11

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010217652023 2025:GAU-AS:15287 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5737/2023 SUJOY PAUL SON OF SRI SHISHIR KRISHNA PAUL, PRESENT AND CORRESPONDING ADDRESS- FLAT NO. 604D, BALI ENCLAVE, MEGZINE, PATHARQUARRY, P.O.- UDAYAN VIHAR, P.S.- NOONMATI, GUWAHATI- 781171, DISTRICT- KAMRUP(METRO), ASSAM. PERMANENT ADDRESS- HARANGAJAO BAZAR PART-II, HARANGAJAO BAZAR, NORTH CACHAR HILLS, DISTRICT- DIMA HASAO (ASSAM), PIN- 788818. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (L AND E), MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPOWERMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION REPRESENTED BY THE CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (CPFC) HEAD OFFICE BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAWAN 14 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE NEW DELHI- 110066. Page No.# 2/3 3:THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ZONAL ACC OFFICE NORTH EASTERN REGION (GUWAHATI) BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAWAN G.S. ROAD NEAR BHARALU BRIDGE BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005. 4:THE UNIQUE IDENTIFICAITON AUTHORITY OF INDIA (UIDAI) REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) 3RD FLOOR UIDAI HQRS. BANGAL SAHIB ROAD NEAR KALI MATA MANDIR NEW DELHI- 110001. 5:THE NORTH EASTERN DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. (NEDFI) REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (DGM) HRD AND LEGAL NEDFI HOUSE G.S. ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. O LASKAR, MS A GOGOI,MR. U N CHATTRY Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MS. M DUTTA (R-2,3),MR A CHAKRABORTY (R- 2,3),MR. S K CHAKRABORTY (R-2,3),MR. P K ROY (R-2,3),MR. R K D CHOUDHURY (DY.S.G.I., R1),MR G DAS (R-5),A. N. H PHOM,SC, PF Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 12-11-2025 Heard Mr. O. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that he has an instruction to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh. Mr. P. K. Roy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S. K. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 & 3, is present. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal with a liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant