IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15193 of 2024 Date of Decision: 13.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Apoorv Sharma …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathore, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Though, respondent No.4 stands served, but has chosen not to come present and as such, he is ordered to be proceeded against ex-parte. 2. While placing on record communication dated 02.05.2025, issued under the signatures of Deputy Secretary (Revenue) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that impugned transfer order has been cancelled and as such, present petition has been rendered infructuous. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. Having perused aforesaid communication as well as copy of notification dated 28.4.2025, this Court finds that transfer order of Sh. Apoorv Sharma(petitioner herein) Tehsildar from Tehsil Office Shimla (Urban) District Shimla to the office of Tehsildar Recovery, Shimla vice Sh. H.L. Ghezta, re-engaged Tehsildar vice versa has been cancelled. 4. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and accordingly same is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Interim order, if any, is vacated. Pending applications stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 13, 2025 (shankar)