Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28003 (PNJ)

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/10004/2025 · 2025-05-06

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CRM-M-10004-2025 1 235 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10004-2025 Decided on: 06.05.2025 Anil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 338 01.08.2024 Sadar Fatehabad, Disstrict Fatehabad 22C, 27A, 29 of NDPS Act 1985 1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above has come before this Court seeking regular bail under Section 483 BNSS. 2. At the outset, petitioner’s counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh with better particulars. 3. Given above, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that power of attorney filed in the present case shall suffice and there shall be no need to file fresh power of attorney in the fresh petition, if filed and Registry shall not raise any objection. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 06.05.2025 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No. ANJU RANI 2025.05.08 13:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh