Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CRM-M-10004-2025 1
235
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-10004-2025 Decided on: 06.05.2025
Anil Kumar
...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana
…Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab.
**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 338 01.08.2024 Sadar Fatehabad, Disstrict Fatehabad 22C, 27A, 29 of NDPS Act 1985
1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above has come before this Court seeking regular bail under Section 483 BNSS.
2. At the outset, petitioner’s counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh with better particulars.
3. Given above, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that power of attorney filed in the present case shall suffice and there shall be no need to file fresh power of attorney in the fresh petition, if filed and Registry shall not raise any objection. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE 06.05.2025 anju rani
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:
No.
ANJU RANI 2025.05.08 13:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh