Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28002 (JHR)

MD. SAFIQ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/599/2025 · 2025-09-10

Rajesh Shankar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:27471-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 599 of 2025 1. Md. Safiq Ansari, S/o Late Samsul Haque, R/o Village & PO- Barki Pona, PS-Rajrappa, District-Ramgarh 2. Pradeep Prasad Kushwaha, S/o Ishwar Prasad Kushwaha, R/o Village-Potma, PO-Sabalpur, PS-Suriya, District-Giridih 3. Anil Kumar Lohra, S/o Shivganga Ram Lohra, R/o Village & PO-Bakudi, PS-Tinpahar, District-Sahebganj 4. Satish Kumar Gupta, S/o Late Kashi Nath Shaw, R/o Bhistipara, Hirapur, PO, PS & District-Dhanbad 5. Reyaz Ansari, S/o Rabul Ansari, R/o Village-Asurbandh, PO- Pordag, PS-Dumri, Disrict-Giridih ... ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Shashi Prakash Singh, Director, Primary Education Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi … … Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. Gaurav Raj, AC to AAG-II ----- Order No. 03 Dated: 10.09.2025 Since the petitioners have already been considered in the counselling as was directed vide order dated 15.09.2023 passed in a batch of L.P.As led by L.P.A No. 203 of 2022 [The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Vs. Paras Nath Mandal], no case of contempt is made out. 2. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. 3. However, in case the petitioners have any further grievance, they are at liberty to avail such remedy as available to them under the law. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish/Ritesh