Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27992 (JHR)

NARESH SINGH v. SHYAMAL MAHTO

C.M.P./1187/2023 · 2025-07-15

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:19287 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 1187 of 2023 Naresh Singh, aged about 42 years, son of late Hari Singh, resident of village Puranidih, P.O. Koeridih, P.S. Bagodar, Now Sariya, District-Giridih 2. Rita Devi aged about 45 years W/O Murari Rai, resident of village Khairidih, P.O. Khairidih, P.S.Birni, District- Giridih………….Petitioners. Versus- 1. Shyamal Mahto S/O Late Kunjo Mahto 2. Manik Mahto S/O Late Kunjo Mahto 3. Tarkeshwar Yadav S/O Barhan Mahto 4. Sahdeo Yadav S/O Jago Mahto 5. Mt. Laliya W/O Late Kunjo Mahto 6. Prem Mahto S/O Late Kehar Mahto 7. Hemiya Devi W/O Prem Mahto , resident of at Puranidih, P.O. Koeridih, P.S. Bagodar, Now Sariya, District-Giriidih 8. Anirudh Mahto 9. Uttim Mahto 10. Ishwar Mahto 11. Jitan Mahto 12. Shukhdeo Mahto 13. Mahabir Mahto No. 8 to 13 all sons of Late Prem Mahto, Resident of village- Puranidih, P.O. Koeridih, P.S. Bagodar, now Suriya, District- Giridih. 14. Kokil Mahto S/O Late Amrit Mahto 15. Mt. Makho W/O Late Ramchandra Singh 16. Baldeo Singh S/O Late Ramchandra Singh 17. Kanhaiya Singh S/O Late Ramchandra Singh 18. Mt. Shanti Devi W/O Late Kanhaiya Singh 19. Mt. Lado W/O Late Pemlal Singh 20. Arjun Singh S/O Pemlal Singh 21. Babulal Singh S/O Late Prayag Singh. ( 2025:JHHC:19287 2 22. Asha Devi W/O Late Babulal Singh 23. Kumari Sonu - minor D/O Late Babulal Singh 24. Kumari Neelu -minor- D/O Late Babulal Singh 25. Nunu- Minor- S/O Late Babulal Singh. No. 23 to 25-minor represented through mother and natural guardian Asha Devi. All 14 to 25 resident of at Puranidih, P.S. Bagodar, now Sariya, District-Giridih .…… Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate For the O.P. Nos. 1, 2 and 3 : Mr. Shayam Sundar Prasad Koshwah, Advocate 06/Dated: 15/07/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that inadvertently party position has not been correctly made and in this regard amendment petition has been filed. 2. From the amendment petition, it transpires that entire party position will change. 3. In view of above, this petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh petition. 4. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Satyarthi/-