Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27985 (RAJ)

MANISH S/O SHRI KANTA PRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10449/2025 · 2025-08-29

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34777] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10449/2025 Manish S/o Shri Kanta Prasad, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Brahman Basti Gadh Mandora, P.s. Masalpur, District Karauli, At Present Raghunathpuri, P.s. Pratap Nagar, District Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Gour Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 29/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Manish S/o Shri Kanta Prasad in FIR No. 770/2025 dated 26.07.2025 registered at P.S. Muhana District – Jaipur City (South), whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 309(4) of BNS. 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for petitioner further submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner accused and he is [2025:RJ-JP:34777] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10449/2025] not named in the report. He further submitted that no recovery is effected from petitioner accused and there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner accused. He also submitted that the offence is triable by Magistrate. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and he submitted report received from P.S. Muhana, Jaipur (South). 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On the basis of report dated 26.07.2025 about robbery by two persons a criminal case is registered. During investigation petitioner accused is arrested by concealing his identity and a test identification parade was conducted. After investigation police has found involvement of petitioner accused. There is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner accused. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Manish S/o Shri Kanta Prasad, is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of [2025:RJ-JP:34777] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10449/2025] like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /126