IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CMP(M) No.64 of 2025 in Review Petition No. 17 of 2025 Decided on: 8th April, 2025 M/s Lakhwinder Singh Stone Crushers .......applicant/petitioner versus Union of India and others ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ramanand Sharma and Mr. Ashutosh Shankar, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Dy.SGI with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 3. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Navlesh Verma, Addl. A.G and Mr. Sushant Keprate, Addl. A.G. for respondents No.2 & 4. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) CMP(M) No.64 of 2025 For the reasons stated in the application, we find sufficient cause having been carved out, which prevented the applicant from filing the review petition within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 condone the delay of five days that has crept up in filing the petition. The application stands disposed of. The Review Petition be registered. Review Petition No. 17 of 2025 Heard. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge April 08, 2025 ( Satyen Vaidya ) (naveen) Judge