IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15796 of 2024 Date of decision: 09.01.2025 Surjeet Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. B.R. Dhiman, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to allow him to continue in service till his attaining the age of 60 years in light of law laid down in Satya Devi vs. State of H.P. & Ors1. 2. Noticing the contention of the petitioner, following order was passed in the matter on 30.12.2024:- “Petitioner contends that in view of law laid down in CWP No. 2274 of 2021 (Satya Devi Vs. State of H.P. and others) and connected matters, he is entitled to serve with the respondents till he attains the age of 60 years i.e. 30.04.2027, whereas, the respondents are going to retire him on 30.04.2025, on his attaining the age of 58 years. Let learned Additional Advocate General to have instruction in the matter, specifically as to whether the case of the petitioner is covered under the aforesaid judgment. 1CWP No.2274 of 2021, decided along with connected matters on 28.05.2024 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes -2- List on 09.01.2025. ” 3. Respondents in their instructions dated 09.01.2025 have not disputed that the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid decision in Satya Devi’s1 case. Therefore, there shall be a direction to the respondents to confer the benefit of the aforesaid decision to the petitioner and allow him to continue in service till he attains the age of 60 years. This, shall, however, be subject to outcome of the SLP filed by the respondents in the aforesaid decision. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 9th January, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)