Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27969 (RAJ)

SONARAM S/O SHRI SEDURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/12736/2025 · 2025-09-03

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35322] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12736/2025 Sonaram S/o Shri Seduram, R/o Kishorepura, Tehsil - Shri Madhopur, District- Sikar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Revenue Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Sub Divisional Officer, Shri Madhopur, District - Sikar, Rajasthan 3. Sub-Tehsildar, Ajitgarh, District - Sikar, Rajasthan 4. Tehsildar, Shri Madhopur, District - Sikar, Rajasthan 5. Collector, Ajitgarh, District - Sikar, Rajasthan 6. Patwari, Ajitgarh, District - Sikar, Rajasthan 7. Land Record Officer, Ajitgarh, District - Sikar, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. G. S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 03/09/2025 Present petition is filed against the order dated 17.12.2021 (Annexure-4) passed by respondent No. 3-Sub Tehsildar. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the authorities/respondents have acted contrary to the directions passed in the order dated 17.12.2021, whereby it was directed that way has to be carved out from the land of Khasra No. 549, despite the same the respondents have carved the way out of land Khasra No. 545, which is not in accordance with the law. [2025:RJ-JP:35322] (2 of 2) [CW-12736/2025] Additionally, it is submitted that in this regard, petitioner has filed a representation dated 16.07.2025 before the competent Authority-Respondent No. 2, however, the same is not considered. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the respondent No. 2-Sub Divisional Officer to consider the representation filed by the petitioner and decide the same within a period of 15 days from the date of passing of this order, strictly in accordance with law and in light of order dated 17.12.2021. Further, petitioner is directed to mark appearance before the respondent No. 2 on 11.09.2025 at 11.00 AM and due audience be given to the petitioner and speaking order be passed as per the ratio encapsulated in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /155