APHC010397712004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17581/2004 Between: 1. KOMMIREDDY SURYANARAYANA, W.G.DIST.,, S/O RANGA RAO, JUNIOR ASSISTANT AT SRI KAPILA MALLESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP BY SECY ENDOWMENTS DEPT HYD 4, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, TILAK ROAD, ABIDS, HYDERABAD. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, KAKINADA. 4. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT. 5. SRI INDESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN, TRUST BOARD, PENUMANTRA VILLAGE & MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus a. declaring the action of the respondent no.4 in issuing a 2 charge sheet cum suspension vide proceedings Rc.No.A1/10273/2004, dt.17- 9-2004 as arbitrary, illegal and in violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, b. Declare that the charge sheet cum suspension vide proceedings Rc.No.A1/10273/2004 dt.17-9-2004 is vague, baseless and without jurisdiction. c. and consequently direct the respondents not to give effect to the charge sheet cum suspension proceedings Rc.No.A1/10273/2002 dt.17-9-2004 so as to enable the petitioner to continue in service IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 23029 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents not to give effect to the charge sheet cum suspension proceedings Rc.No.A1/10273/2004 dt.17-9-2004 so as to enable the petitioner to continue in service Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N INDRANI 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 3 The Court made the following order: When the matter is taken up for consideration today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Ms.Ujwala Devi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the respondent-department has reinstated the petitioner into service. Taking the submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader into consideration, since the petitioner has been reinstated into service, there remains nothing for adjudication. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infrucutous. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 22.08.2025 MP 4 160 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17581 of 2004 Dated: 22.08.2025 MP 5