Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27960 (RAJ)

MEETU BHARGAVA W/O LATE ANSHU BHARGAVA v. KRISHNAKUMAR S/O SHRI CHIRANJILAL

CMA/2638/2023 · 2025-07-28

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:28394] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2638/2023 1. Meetu Bhargava W/o Late Anshu Bhargava, R/o Plot No. 2, Vivekanand Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur District Jaipur. 2. Rakshita Bhargava D/o Late Shri Anshu Bhargava now major at the age of 23 years, R/o Plot No. 2, Vivekanand Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur District Jaipur. 3. Riddhi Bhargava D/o Late Shri Anshu Bhargava, now major at the age of 20 years, R/o Plot No. 2, Vivekanand Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur District Jaipur. 4. Saksham Bhargava S/o Late Shri Anshu Bhargava, (No.4 is minor through mother and natural guardian Meetu Bhargava) R/o Plot No. 2, Vivekanand Colony, Jhotwara, Jaipur District Jaipur. ----Appellants/Defendants/Applicants Versus 1. Krishnakumar S/o Shri Chiranjilal, R/o House No. E-2, Pratap Nagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur District Jaiapur. Now the R/o P.No.137, Vijay Singh Pathik Nagar, Gurjar Colony, Jhotwara, Kalwar Raod, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent/Plaintiff/Non-applicant 2. Sub Registrar, Sub Registration Office, Chomu, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur. 3. State of Rajasthan through Tehsildar, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Performa Respondent/Defendant/Non-applicant For Appellant(s) : None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 28/07/2025 No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants, even in second round. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /161