SARDAR SINGH SON OF GANESH RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/13036/2025 · 2025-08-29
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27954 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27954 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34616] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13036/2025
1. Sardar Singh Son Of Ganesh Ram, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Village Arjunpura, Post Dhola, Via Gathwadi, Tehsil Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Giriraj Sain Son Of Shri Prabhu Ram Sain, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Village Nonpura, Post Papar, Via Kanota, District Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Rajendra Kumar Nagar Son Of Amar Lal Nagar, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Village Sarkhandiya, Post Panwar, Tehsil Khanpur, District Jhalawar (Raj.)
4. Mukesh Kumar Son Of Shri Krishan Lal, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 15, Near Indira School, Rawala Mandi, Tehsil Gharsana, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)
5. Raju Lal Kurdiya Son Of Meettu Lal Kurdiya, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of 217, Mataji Ki Gali, Budhwara, Pisangan, District Ajmer (Raj.)
6. Pappu Singh Son Of Mang Singh, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Vpo- Aamla, Tehsil Makrana, District Nagour (Raj.)
7. Ravi Mohan Meena Son Of Bhagvan Sahay Meena, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Harnath Ka Bass, Post Mandawar, Teshil Mahawa, Nangal Sumersingh, Jatwara, District Dausa (Raj.)
8. Kavita D/o Kanalal, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Ambedkar Circle, Badi Basti, Pushkar, District Ajmer (Raj.)
9. Harshita Gundrachia D/o Om Prakash Gundrachia, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of House No. 1358/26, Bhagwanganj, Ajmer (Raj.)
10. Nisha Kumari Meena D/o Dharmi Ram Meena W/o Kripa Shankar Meena, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Salimpura, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Secretariat Jaipur.
[2025:RJ-JP:34616] (2 of 3) [CW-13036/2025]
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jaipur.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Karauli.
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Ajmer.
5. The Development Officer Panchayat Samiti, Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur.
6. The
Development
Officer
Panchayat
Samiti, Madhorajpura, District Jaipur.
7. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Mandrayal, District Karauli.
8. The Development Officer Panchayat Samiti Pisangan, District Ajmer.
9. The Development Officer Panchayat Samiti Ajmer Rura, District Ajmer.
10. The Development Officer Panchayat Samiti Masuda, District Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Gouttan for Mr. R.K. Gouttam For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order 29/08/2025 Although, in the writ petition, a direction is sought to the respondents to extend the petitioners notional and other service benefits from the date similarly situated persons have been extended these benefits under the LDC recruitment, 2013; but,
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they would feel contented if they are granted a liberty to submit representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) who may be directed to decide the same expeditiously taking into
consideration the order/judgment of this Court dated 18.07.2018
[2025:RJ-JP:34616] (3 of 3) [CW-13036/2025] passed in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma and Others vs. State of Rajasthan and Others: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12109/2018. In view of the nature of prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and an order of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notice to the respondents: (1) The petitioners are at liberty to file representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. (2) The respondents shall pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt taking into
consideration the order/judgment of this Court dated 18.07.2018 passed in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma (supra) with communication of the decision to them. (3) If the petitioners are found eligible and entitled for grant of notional and other service benefits as paid to the similarly situated employees, the compliance shall be made within a period of 8 weeks from the date of taking the decision. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /45