Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:24544
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Exe. Pet. (T) No. 19 of 2025
Decided on: 28.07.2025 Satish Kumar Chaudhary
… Petitioner
Versus
State of HP and others
… Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner
: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional
Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned Counsel for the parties are ad idem that now the
judgment passed by this Court has been complied with in letter and spirit.
2.
At this stage, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty be reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court, in case, according to him, there is any remiss in the implementation of the
judgment. Liberty granted.
2.
Accordingly, these proceedings are closed with liberty as prayed for.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge July 28, 2025 (narender)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?