Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27933 (AP)

Vallepu Srinivasa Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary

WP/10888/2009 · 2025-07-31

Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010397232009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3299] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI I.A.No.1 of 2025 In/and WRIT PETITION NO: 10888/2009 Between: 1. VALLEPU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. NARAYANA R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. VALLEPU NARAYANA, S/O. AADAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THANNIRU RAMANAMMA, W/O. KONDAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. KUNCHALA VENKATESWARLU, S/O. SUBBAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. KUNCHALA ANKAMMA, S/O. CHANDRAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. VALLEPU SINGAIAH, S/O. VENKATSWARLU R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. KUNCHALA SUBBA RAO, S/O. CHANDRAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. KUNCHALA SRINU, S/O. SUBBA RAO R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 9. THANNIRU SINGHAIAH, S/O. CHINNA PERAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 10. KUNCHALA NAGENDRAM, W/O. CHANDRAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 11. KUNCHALA YEDUKONDALU, S/O. KOTAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 12. VALLEPU VENKATESWARLU, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 13. KUNCHALA SRINU, S/O. VENKATESWARLU R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 14. THANNIRU KOTAMMA, W/O. SRINU R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 15. KUNCHALA VENKATESWARLU, S/O. YALLAMANDA R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 16. KUNCHALA AADEYYA, S/O. VEERAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 17. KUNCHALA SRINU, S/O. AADEYYA R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 18. KUNCHALA RAMANJANEYULU, S/O. YEDUKONDALU R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 19. KUNCHALA YEDUKONDALU, S/O. KOTAIAH R/O. ANNANGI VILLAGE, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO REVENUE [LAND ACQUISITION] DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, KANDULA OBULA REDDY GUNDLAKAMMA RESERVOIR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. TAHSILDAR, MADDIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not inducting he petitioners in to ground possession of their respective plots as illegal, irregular, contrary to the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, Revenue Board Standing Orders and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to induct the petitioners on ground possession of their respective plots granted in proceedings MRO/RC No.125/2007, dt. 30.04.2007 issued by the 3rd respondent, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2009 (WPMP 13997 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to induct the petitioners on the ground possession of their respective house site plots granted by the 3rd respondent in proceedings MRO/RC No.125/2007, dt. 30.04.2007, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit petitioners to withdraw the present Writ Petition No. 10888 of 2009 and pending Interlocutory Applications therein, in the interests of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI I.A.No.1 of 2025 In/and WRIT PETITION NO: 10888/2009 ORDER: Heard Sri T.Praveen Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. I.A.No.1 of 2025 has been filed by petitioner No.1 on behalf of all the petitioners for withdrawal of the writ petition. 3. In the affidavit, in para-1 it has been stated that the deponent is petitioner No.1 and he has been authorised by the rest of the petitioners to file application. 4. Sri T.Praveen Kumar, learned counsel appears for learned counsel for the petitioners. He submits that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Without observing anything on the merits of the writ petition as also the contents of the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.1 of 2025, as requested, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J Dated: 01.08.2025 AG 22 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI I.A.No.1 of 2025 In/and WRIT PETITION NO: 10888/2009 Dated: 01.08.2025 AG