RAJENDRA DUBEY @ RAJENDRA KUMAR DUBEY v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/7329/2025 · 2025-03-11
Vikram D Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27931 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27931 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7329 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra Dubey @ Rajendra Kumar Dubey Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Chaubey,Ashutosh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:
" i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the application dated 28.02.2020 bearing file no.58 in regard to grant of Arms License to the petitioner pending before him within stipulated time. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the application for grant of Arms License of the petitioner and to decide the issue of grant of Arms License in the interest of justice."
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has applied for grant of arms licence before the respondent no. 2 in the year 2020, however, till date the aforesaid application of the petitioner has not been decided by the concerned authority.
4. It is to be seen that before this Court large number of petitions are being filed for directing the licencing authorities to consider the application for grant of arms licence of the applicants. The aforesaid large number of petitions are indicative of the fact that licencing authorities are not considering the applications for grant of arms licence in a time bound manner. The same may be indicative of red tapism, negligence or corrupt practices. The applications of the citizens are required to be considered by the authorities in a time bound manner so that citizens do not face any difficulty on account of pendency of their applications.
5. Learned Standing Counsel submits that application of the petitioner for grant of arms licence would be decided in a time
bound manner.
6. Considering the circumstances of the case and the fact that application of the petitioner for grant of arms licence is pending
consideration before the respondent no. 2, it is hereby directed that application for grant of arms licence of the petitioner shall be decided by the licencing authority within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is hereby also provided that in the event the aforesaid application of the petitioner for grant of arms licence is not disposed of within the period herein above granted, the petitioner would be entitled to cost/compensation @ Rs.100/- per day (for each day delay after two months) which is to be paid by the respondent no.2 at the first instance and the same would be recoverable by the respondent no.2 from the salary of the erring officials. This cost/compensation is in addition to the other legal remedies available to the petitioner including the enforcement of the present order, accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition is
disposed of.
Order Date :- 12.3.2025 S.Prakash Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad