Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:18727 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.1273 of 2024 in CWP No.8459 of 2022 Decided on: 18.06.2025 Akshay Sharma
… Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh … Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner : Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Bhavni Negi, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has handed over a copy of Instructions, imparted by under Secretary (Technical Education), to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, dated 13.06.2025, which reads as under:-
“I have the honour to refer to the subject cited and to say that in pursuance to judgment dated 28.08.2024 in CWP No. 8459/2022 titled as Akshay Sharma V/s State of H.P & Ors, the order to take over the services of Sh. Akshay Sharma, Assistant Professor (Textile Engineering) appointed under Student Welfare Fund (SWF) in Jawaharlal Nehru Government Engineering College Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. on contract basis have been issued vide this Department's Notification No. EDN(TE) E(1)51/2022 dated 06.06.2025 (copy enclosed). In addition to this, the regularization order of said Assistant Professor (Textile Engineering) have also been issued by this Department(s) Notification No. EDN(TE) E(1)51/2022 dated 13.06.2025 (copy enclosed). 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:18727
In view of above, you are, requested to apprise the Hon'ble High Court with the factual position and with a request to dispose of the present petition as order for taking over the services on contract basis as well as of regularization orders have been issued.” Alongwith the Instructions, copy of Notifications dated 06.06.2025 and 13.06.2025 are also appended. The Instructions alongwith the Notifications are ordered to be taken on record. 2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that part of the judgment dealing with the grant of consequential monetary benefits does not finds mention in the Notifications. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that some reasonable time be granted to make good the consequential monetary benefits. Let, needful be done within a period of three months. 3. With these observations, these proceedings are closed, but for the purpose of filing of the compliance affidavit qua the payment of monetary benefits, list on 06.10.2025. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge June 18, 2025 (Rishi)