HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 769/2024 Chotta Devi W/o Shri Bal Chand, Resident Of Village- Dhani Lakha Ki Tan Kharkheda, Tehsil Behror, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Praveen Gupta, State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Sec- retary, Public Works Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Manoj Dave, The Chief Engineer, Public Works Depart- ment, Govt Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Sanjeet Kumar, Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Behror, Distt. Alwar. 4. Hotilal, The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Behror, Distt. Alwar. 5. Ramkisore Meena, The Land Acquisition Officer, (Sdo) Behror, Distt. Alwar. 6. Kalpana Agarwal, The Collector And District Magistrate, Alwar. 7. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Singh on behalf of Mr. S.S. Raghav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi with Ms. Tanvisha Pant on behalf of Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 18/09/2025 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleg- ing non-compliance of order dated 16.07.2024. (2 of 2) [CCP-769/2024] 2. By interim order dated 16.07.2024, the Court had observed that house of the petitioner shall not be demolished. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after passing of the interim order of not demolishing the house of the petitioner, the respondents have come to her house and demolished it. 4. On perusal of the averments made in the contempt petition, the petitioner has nowhere stated that after passing of the interim order, on which date the respondents came to her house and de- molished it. 5. The contempt petition was filed on 08.08.2024. By the date of filing of this contempt petition, the petitioner has nowhere stated that on such and such dates the respondents have demol- ished her house. 6. Without there being any material and contents of allegations against the contemnor respondents, no contempt proceedings can be drawn against them. 7. Since this contempt petition lacks the specific allegation of disobedience of the Court's order, the same deserves to be dis- missed. 8. Accordingly, this contempt petition is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/Satyendra/60