Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27925 (AP)

Y. Maheshwar Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/18412/2018 · 2025-03-24

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010397132018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI WRIT PETITION Between: Y. Maheshwar Reddy, The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS 2. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) 3. B PRAKASAM (Sr SC FOR A M C ) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18412/2018 Y. Maheshwar Reddy, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) PRAKASAM (Sr SC FOR A M C ) The Court made the following: [3396] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the orders of the 3rd respondent in Notice No 2/2018 dated 21 5 2018 whereby surrendering me to the 4th respondent even without giving me any notice for giving explanantion as being illegal arbitrary and is in total violation of basic cannons of justice as well principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture on behalf of the respondents are in attendance. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required and the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 24.3.2024 TJN 185 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18412 OF 2018 Dated: 24.03.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Writ Petition No.18412 of 2018 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 04. 24.03.2025 Dr.VJP, J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide Separate Order) _________ Dr.VJP, J TJN