Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27922 (KAR)

MR.MANIVANNAN N v. MR.A.AROKIA SWAMY

CRP/326/2022 · 2025-02-13

R Devdas

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6528 CRP No. 326 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 326 OF 2022 BETWEEN: MR.MANIVANNAN N S/O R NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/ AT NO 28, BAZAAR STREET GOWTHAMALURAM, HALASURU BENGALURU- 560008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. UDITA RAMESH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR.A.AROKIA SWAMY S/O LATE ARPUTHAM AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, R/AT NO 27/29, BAZAAR STREET GOWTHAMALURAM HALASURU BENGALURU-560008. 2. MR A JOHN PINTO S/O MR AROKIA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/A NO 27/29, BAZAAR STREET Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6528 CRP No. 326 of 2022 GOWTHAMALURAM, HALASURU BENGALURU -560008. 3. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R SQUARE, BENGALURU 560002 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE WARD NO 114 AGARAM BENGALURU- 560008. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BENGALURU WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD HALASURU, BENGALURU- 560008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 SMT. P.S. POORNIMA., ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4 R5 SERVED, UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.12.2021 PASSED ON IA No.VII IN OS.No.7684/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE X ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, REJECTING THE IA No.VII FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6528 CRP No. 326 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 13.02.2025 stating that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.7684/2017 was dismissed as withdrawn on 05.08.2024 and therefore, the prayer made in the petition has become infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 4. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL