Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010179122025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4626/2025 SHARMILA DEY W/O PRADIP DEY, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT KATHAL ROAD OPP. PRERONA BHARATI PRESS, P.O. BHAKATPUR, P.S. SILCHAR, PIN 788001, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PERMENENT R/O VILL. TENGAPARA WARD NO. 5, P.O. AND P.S. KOKRAJHAR, PIN 783370, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPTT. DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6 2:THE BOROLAND TERRITORIAL AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY. BTAD CHIRANG ASSAM. 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM STATE HOME DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM B.K. KAKATY ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI 7 5:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMN) Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM .BK. KAKOTY ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI 7 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CHIRANG (BTAD) KAJALGAON ASSAM 7:THE DIST. MAGISTRATE CUM DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIRANG (LAW AND ORDER) DIST. CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM. 8:THE MOTO TRANSPORT OFFICER (MTO) CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J I BORBHUIYA, MR A HOSSAIN,MR. L MOHAN,MRS. K H CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, BTC Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 17/11/2025 Heard Mr. J. I. Borbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Baruah, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the State respondents. Also heard Ms. N Choudhury, learned Standing counsel, BTC. 2. The petitioner by way of instituting the present writ petition, has raised a grievance with regard to non-payment of the bills so raised by her in connection with the requisition of her vehicles by the State respondents. 3. It is contended that the vehicles were so requisitioned for different purposes and thereafter, they were so released after utilizing them for the periods, as noted in Annexure-2 of the writ petition. 4. It is also contended that after the requisition period was over and the vehicles were returned; the petitioner had submitted the bills against the requisition of her vehicles. However, the respondent authorities have not cleared the bills, in question, and on account of such inaction on the part of the respondent authorities; the petitioner has instituted the present proceeding. 5. Mr. Baruah, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State respondent, on instructions, has submitted that the claim made by the petitioner for an amount of Rs.50,87,378/- (Rupees Fifty Lakhs Eighty Seven Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy Eight) only, is not admitted by the respondent authorities. He, however, submits that the vehicles of the petitioner were requisitioned by the State respondents and utilized by them. 6. In view of the above position, the petitioner is now required to submit representations against each of the vehicles, so requisitioned by the State respondents with all particulars so necessitated before the Superintendent of Police, Chirang (BTAD), Kajalgaon, Assam (respondent No. 6, herein), within a period of 10(ten) days from today along with a certified Page No.# 4/4 copy of this order and claim the amounts due to her. 7. The Superintendent of Police, Chirang (BTAD), Kajalgaon, Assam, respondent No. 6, on receipt of such representations, shall examine the claim so made by the petitioner and on such examination being made with the contemporaneous records as maintained in the matter; shall determine the amount so due to the petitioner against each of her vehicles. 8. The amount so determined, shall, thereafter, be released to the petitioner within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of the representations along with a certified copy of this order. 9. With the above directions and observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant