1 22 ca 9956.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9956 OF 2025 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3547 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 455 OF 1999 Maimunabegum Sk. Rahman Since deceased through L.Rs. Shaikh Rahman and others .. Applicants Versus Bismillabi Allauddin Since deceased through L.Rs. Wahed L.Rs. Hamid L.Rs. Sayeed L.Rs. Rasheed L.Rs. Nasim and others .. Respondents Shri Asif Ali, Advocate h/f Mrs. A. N. Ansari, Advocate for the Applicants. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2025. FINAL ORDER : . Heard Mr. Asif Ali, learned counsel for the applicants. Respondent No. 1-4-A is unable to be served by regular mode of service. 2. Applicants are required to resort to substituted mode of service. 3. Considering the averments in the application, the civil 2025:BHC-AUG:25168 2 22 ca 9956.25 application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. The civil application is disposed of. 4. Notice is made returnable on 16.10.2025. 5. It is clarified that a comprehensive notice in civil application as well as second appeal shall be issued through substituted mode of service. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Sept. 25