Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27905 (RAJ)

KASHMIR SINGH S/O NISHAN SINGH v. CBN

CRLMA/393/2025 · 2025-09-04

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 393/2025 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.3619/2025 Kashmir Singh S/o Nishan Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o House No. 87, Nandpur Road, New Vivek Vihar, Police Station Maksudan, Jalandhar Punjab (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Applicant Versus CBN, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. Mr. Devi Singh, Dy. G.A. Mr. Vaibhav Jhankra, Adv. for Mr. Tej Prakash Sharma, SPP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 04/09/2025 1. The present criminal miscellaneous application has been filed for modification of the order dated 29.04.2025 passed by this Court. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that while allowing S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.3619/2025 filed by the applicant, this Court has imposed the condition of furnishing two attested solvent sureties. Learned counsel further submits that the applicant is not in a position to furnish two attested solvent sureties, therefore, the order dated 29.04.2025 (2 of 2) [CRLMA-393/2025] passed by this Court be modified to the extent of furnishing two solvent sureties. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the order dated 29.04.2025 passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.3619/2025 is modified to the extent that the accused-applicant shall furnish two solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each instead of furnishing two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. However, it is made clear that out of the two solvent sureties, one shall be a family member of the accused-applicant and rest of the condition shall remain same. 4. Accordingly, the present miscellaneous application is allowed. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /47