[2025:RJ-JP:32885] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12475/2025 Sujan Singh S/o Shri Mehar Chand, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village Bhitera, Tehsil-Behror, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan Presently Working at Seehid Amar Singh Government Upper Primary School Sanoli, Tehsil- Mundawar, District- Khairthal- Tijara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its District Election Officer, District-Khairtal-Tijara, Jaipur (Raj). 2. The Electoral Registraton Officer, (SDM), Mundawar, District-Khairthal-Tijara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Yadav Ms. Anisha Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 21/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by an order dated 22.07.2025, passed by a Single Bench of this Court at the principal seat, Jodhpur, in a batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12975/2025: Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions of his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if he is accorded an opportunity to file a fresh representation in the office of respondent No.1 with regard to the grievances raised in the [2025:RJ-JP:32885] (2 of 2) [CW-12475/2025] present writ petition and a direction may be issued to the respondent No.1 to decide the representation of the petitioner in a time-bound manner. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation in the office of respondent No.1 and the respondent No.1 is directed to decide the same within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation; and if the case of the petitioner falls within the purview of the law laid down in the case of Ten Singh (supra); the same shall be decided in terms of the said judgment. 4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition, and only if the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought. 5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-2