IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15383 of 2024 Decided on: 08.01.2025 Mamta Sharma … Petitioner Versus The State of H.P. and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vijay Bir Singh, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sumit Sharma, DAG. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Sumit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that interest of justice would be served, in case, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents- Competent Authority, with regard to the issue raised in the writ petition, within two weeks from today and same be ordered to be decided by the competent Authority within some time bound period. 3. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the observation that in the event of the petitioner making a representation with regard to her grievance within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be decided by the competent 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt thereof, in view of the averments contained therein and taking into consideration the judgment(s), if any, being relied upon by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation as far as the merit of the case are concerned and the representation shall be decided by the Authority concerned in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 08, 2025 (narender)