Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27901 (AP)

Mynampati Srinivasulu v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/18422/2018 · 2025-07-14

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010396462018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18422/2018 Between: 1. MYNAMPATI SRINIVASULU, S/O.VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.76-8-18/ 1A, MYNAMPATIVARI VEEDHI, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. GODUGULURI MALAKONDARAYUDU, S/O.MALAKONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.76-1-78B, DARGA PLOTS, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. SRI G RAMAKRISHNA ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WEST, I TOWN, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. SRI PRAKASH BABU ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, OPP. PWD GROUND, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. SRI BHASKAR ASSISTANT SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WEST, I TOWN, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 6. KOTERU SREENIVASA REDDY, S/O.DHARMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.1-4/7-22/1, ANDAMANI BRAHMAIAH STREET, VIDYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 3 and 5 in seeking to interfere in the civil disputes between them and the 6th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary etc., and grant 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V L N SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. M JAYARAM REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 3 and 5 in seeking to interfere in the civil disputes between them and the 6th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary etc., and grant ....” 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents is in attendance. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 18422 of 2018 15.07.2025 Mjl /*