MASHUK AHMED and 8 ORS. v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA and 6 ORS.
WP(C)/5052/2017 · 2025-11-05
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27900 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27900 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010035782017
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5052/2017 MASHUK AHMED and 8 ORS.
S/O- LATE FORJAN ALI, VILL- KASARI PARA, P.O- DOBOKA, PIN- 782440, DIST- HOJAI, ASSAM 2: IDDRISH ALI OHEB S/O- MOHAMMAED NUR UDDIN ALI R/O- LONKA TOWN DIST- HOJAI ASSAM 3: KHAIRUL ISLAM S/O- LATE AMIR UDDIN AHMED VILL- SHOWPUR GAON P.O- JOYANAGAR P.S- MURAJHAR DIST- HOJAI ASSAM 4: ALI AHMED S/O- ABDUL MOTLIB VILL- ROWARPAR P.O- AMBAR P.S- HOJAI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM 5: SYED MAHMMAD ALI S/O- LATE ABDUL RAKIB VILL- SUTARPUR DISTT- HOJAI ASSAM 6: AKLAS UDDIN S/O- LATE ABDUL MALIK
Page No.# 2/4 VILL- DAKHIN NOWBIL P.O- AMBARI P.S- MURAJHAR DIST- HOJAI ASSAM 7: ABDUL KADIR BORBHUYAN S/O- HAJI UMED ALI VILL- ROWARPAR P.O- AMBARI P.S- MURAJHAR DIST- HOJAI ASSAM 8: ABDUL HAI BORBHUYAN S/O- LATE JONAB ALI VILL- DAKHIN NOWBIL P.O- AMBARI P.S- MURAJHAR DIST- HOJAI ASSAM 9: AZIR UDDIN UDDIN S/O- LATE SIKANDOR ALI VILL- SAHARAN P.O- JOYANAGAR P.S- MURAJHAR IST- HOJAI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA and 6 ORS.
REGD OFFICE AT 14TH FLOOR, MADAME CAMA ROAD, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA- 400021 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA GUWAHATI ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE G S ROAD NEAR RAJIV BHAWAN GHY- 06 3:ASSTT. GM BUSINESS OFFICE STATE BANK BHAWAN 1ST FLOOR SBI
Page No.# 3/4 NAGAON- 782001 4:THE BRANCH MANAGER SBI MURAJHAR BRANCH DIST- HOJAI PIN- 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HOJAI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM 6:SPIO ASSAM INFORMATION COMMISSION PANJABARI GUWAHATI- 37 7:THE SPIO O/O CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE NEW DELHI and OLD JNU CAMPUS NEW DELHI- 11006 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORTHAKUR, MR. J ROY,MR. N HASAN,MS. S KAKATI,MR. A HASAN,MR. C CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : , GA, ASSAM,MR. K K DEY(R- 1-4),MR V K BAROOAH(R- 1-4)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER 06.11.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call whereas Shri VK Barooah, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Shri N. Das, learned State Counsel for the official respondents are present. On the last occasion i.e. 22.10.2025, when the matter was listed, the following order was passed-
Page No.# 4/4
“None appears for the petitioner on call whereas Shri VK Barooah,
learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and Shri N. Das, learned State Counsel for the official respondents are present. Perused the order dated 26.09.2025 passed by the learned Lawazima Court from which it reflects that the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 7 in spite of numerous opportunities. Be that as it may, let a further opportunity be granted to the petitioner to make representation and let this matter be listed on
06.11.2025. It is however made clear that in case of further non-representation by the petitioner, this Court would pass appropriate orders.” As indicated above, even today none has appeared for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this case which is pending since the 2017. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed due to want of prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant